Competitor profile

Ms Guru Medakinath Construction Co.

They win 17% of what they bid, and 18% of the value they chase.

62tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
8 Nov 2025last award
Total bids
60
62 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
10
36 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.4 Cr
of ₹24.3 Cr bid — 18.0% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 60 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count60 bids
16.7%
23.3%
60.0%
Awarded1016.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1423.3%
Lost3660.0%
By value₹24.3 Cr
18.0%
27.7%
54.3%
Awarded₹4.4 Cr18.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.7 Cr27.7%
Lost₹13.2 Cr54.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹4.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
VINAYAK BUILDCON5 wins · 52 shared tenders
₹2.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
DINESH CONSTRUCTION CO1 win · 33 shared tenders
₹76.6 L
won head-to-head
03
Ganpati Distributors1 win · 33 shared tenders
₹70.4 L
won head-to-head
04
M E PROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED1 win · 28 shared tenders
₹47.2 L
won head-to-head
05
patni construction2 wins · 26 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
06
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMs Guru Medakinath awardedOthers

About Ms Guru Medakinath Construction Co.

Ms Guru Medakinath Construction Co. appears as a bidder on 62 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 60 decided bids, it was awarded 10 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹4.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Nov 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Deptt. of Watershed Dev. and Soil Conservation, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 9.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against VINAYAK BUILDCON, DINESH CONSTRUCTION CO and Ganpati Distributors. VINAYAK BUILDCON bid on 52 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; Ms Guru Medakinath Construction Co. won 7.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.