Competitor profile

MS Engineering

They win 17% of what they bid, and 8% of the value they chase.

154tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
25 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
153
154 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
26
118 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹7.7 Cr
of ₹92.4 Cr bid — 8.3% conversion
Win rate
17.0%
of 153 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count153 bids
17.0%
77.1%
Awarded2617.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected95.9%
Lost11877.1%
By value₹92.4 Cr
82.7%
Awarded₹7.7 Cr8.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹8.3 Cr8.9%
Lost₹76.4 Cr82.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

IndianOil₹7.7 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

26 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
EMRAD PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED24 wins · 134 shared tenders
₹10.5 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Raghavendra Automation Private Limited12 wins · 116 shared tenders
₹10.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
ELECO ENGINEERING10 wins · 89 shared tenders
₹6.3 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Laycock Engineers Pvt. Ltd8 wins · 85 shared tenders
₹3.6 Cr
won head-to-head
05
Simplex Systems24 wins · 80 shared tenders
₹12.2 Cr
won head-to-head
06
TECHNO CRAFT ENGINEERS3 wins · 43 shared tenders
₹5.3 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMS Engineering awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MS Engineering

About MS Engineering

MS Engineering appears as a bidder on 154 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 153 decided bids, it was awarded 26 — a 17.0% win rate — worth ₹7.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is IndianOil, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 36.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against EMRAD PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED, Raghavendra Automation Private Limited and ELECO ENGINEERING. EMRAD PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED bid on 134 of the same tenders and won 24 of them; MS Engineering won 23.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.