Competitor profile

MS AAMIR FAROOQ BHAT

They win 41% of what they bid, and 34% of the value they chase.

41tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
25 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
37
41 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
15
21 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.7 Cr
of ₹11.0 Cr bid — 33.7% conversion
Win rate
40.5%
of 37 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count37 bids
40.5%
56.8%
Awarded1540.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected12.7%
Lost2156.8%
By value₹11.0 Cr
33.7%
57.7%
Awarded₹3.7 Cr33.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹94.7 L8.6%
Lost₹6.4 Cr57.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

15 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ASHFAQ AHMED MANHAS0 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
NATIONAL TRADING COMPANY3 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
03
GHAI STONE CRUSHER4 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹95.3 L
won head-to-head
04
MS SHAM ARMYSTORE3 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S KABIR CHOUDHARY0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/s Anil Engineers & Builders1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹24.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMS AAMIR FAROOQ awardedOthers

About MS AAMIR FAROOQ BHAT

MS AAMIR FAROOQ BHAT appears as a bidder on 41 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 37 decided bids, it was awarded 15 — a 40.5% win rate — worth ₹3.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ASHFAQ AHMED MANHAS, NATIONAL TRADING COMPANY and GHAI STONE CRUSHER. ASHFAQ AHMED MANHAS bid on 14 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MS AAMIR FAROOQ BHAT won 9.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.