Competitor profile

MRINAL KANTI CHAKRABORTY

They win 89% of what they bid, and 81% of the value they chase.

9tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
20 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
8
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹27.5 L
of ₹33.9 L bid — 81.0% conversion
Win rate
88.9%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count9 bids
88.9%
11.1%
Awarded888.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost111.1%
By value₹33.9 L
81.0%
19.0%
Awarded₹27.5 L81.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹6.5 L19.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Tripura₹27.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Nanu Mia1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹6.2 L
won head-to-head
02
AMAL DEBNATH0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
BADAL MIAH0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
RAKHAL BANIK0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Baban Das0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S GUPTA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMRINAL KANTI awardedOthers

About MRINAL KANTI CHAKRABORTY

MRINAL KANTI CHAKRABORTY appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 8 — a 88.9% win rate — worth ₹27.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chief Engineer, Rural Development Department, at 76.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Tripura. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Nanu Mia, AMAL DEBNATH and BADAL MIAH. Nanu Mia bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; MRINAL KANTI CHAKRABORTY won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.