Competitor profile

Mr Radhey Sham

They win 7% of what they bid, and 7% of the value they chase.

18tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
15
18 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
9 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.7 Cr
of ₹86.8 Cr bid — 6.6% conversion
Win rate
6.7%
of 15 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count15 bids
33.3%
60.0%
Awarded16.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected533.3%
Lost960.0%
By value₹86.8 Cr
35.6%
57.8%
Awarded₹5.7 Cr6.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹30.9 Cr35.6%
Lost₹50.2 Cr57.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RATTAN CHAND AND SONS1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹4.7 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Bhan Construction Group0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S NEEL CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPERS1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹9.9 Cr
won head-to-head
04
SULTAN ALI3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹17.4 Cr
won head-to-head
05
Romesh Singh and Sons0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
AKASH GUPTA0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMr Radhey Sham awardedOthers

About Mr Radhey Sham

Mr Radhey Sham appears as a bidder on 18 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 15 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 6.7% win rate — worth ₹5.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PMGSY Jammu and CE PW (R and B) Jammu, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RATTAN CHAND AND SONS, Bhan Construction Group and M/S NEEL CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPERS. RATTAN CHAND AND SONS bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Mr Radhey Sham won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.