Competitor profile

Mr. Muhammad Aneez

They win 75% of what they bid, and 72% of the value they chase.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
23 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹50.0 L
of ₹69.0 L bid — 72.5% conversion
Win rate
75.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
75.0%
25.0%
Awarded375.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost125.0%
By value₹69.0 L
72.5%
27.5%
Awarded₹50.0 L72.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹19.0 L27.5%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹50.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
JOSE A0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
G. ANIL KUMAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
K S PURASHOTHAMAN0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Jestin0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
NAJIM T K0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
HARIPRASAD P0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMr. Muhammad awardedOthers

About Mr. Muhammad Aneez

Mr. Muhammad Aneez appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 75.0% win rate — worth ₹50.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Kerala State Housing Board, at 82.5% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against JOSE A, G. ANIL KUMAR and K S PURASHOTHAMAN. JOSE A bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Mr. Muhammad Aneez won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.