Competitor profile

Mr JUGAL NAYAK

They win 42% of what they bid — and 58% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

12tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
22 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
12
12 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.5 Cr
of ₹6.0 Cr bid — 58.3% conversion
Win rate
41.7%
of 12 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count12 bids
41.7%
58.3%
Awarded541.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost758.3%
By value₹6.0 Cr
58.3%
41.7%
Awarded₹3.5 Cr58.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.5 Cr41.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

CE RW I₹3.5 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹3.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
GITANJALI PRADHAN1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹41.1 L
won head-to-head
02
SHOBABATI NAYAK3 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹85.9 L
won head-to-head
03
RAJESH KUMAR MAHANA2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹67.7 L
won head-to-head
04
KRISHNA KUMAR AGRAWAL0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
ABINASH BHOI0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SAMPADA SAHU0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMr JUGAL NAYAK awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Mr JUGAL NAYAK

About Mr JUGAL NAYAK

Mr JUGAL NAYAK appears as a bidder on 12 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 12 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 41.7% win rate — worth ₹3.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE RW I, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against GITANJALI PRADHAN, SHOBABATI NAYAK and RAJESH KUMAR MAHANA. GITANJALI PRADHAN bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Mr JUGAL NAYAK won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.