Competitor profile

MOHD SAYEED QURESHI AND SONS

They win 22% of what they bid — and 40% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

9tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
29 Apr 2017last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹9.6 Cr
of ₹24.0 Cr bid — 39.8% conversion
Win rate
22.2%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count9 bids
22.2%
11.1%
66.7%
Awarded222.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected111.1%
Lost666.7%
By value₹24.0 Cr
39.8%
58.9%
Awarded₹9.6 Cr39.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹30.1 L1.3%
Lost₹14.2 Cr58.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹9.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
LAXMI NARYAN AGARWAL0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
R.K. CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
NIKHAT NIRMAN1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
04
vardhman marble and handicraft0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Lakhlan kurashi Const. Co.0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Jainsons Const. Co.1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.0 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMOHD SAYEED awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MOHD SAYEED

About MOHD SAYEED QURESHI AND SONS

MOHD SAYEED QURESHI AND SONS appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 22.2% win rate — worth ₹9.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Apr 2017.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rajasthan Housing Board - CE, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against LAXMI NARYAN AGARWAL, R.K. CONSTRUCTION and NIKHAT NIRMAN. LAXMI NARYAN AGARWAL bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MOHD SAYEED QURESHI AND SONS won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.