Competitor profile

MOHAMMED ANEES P M

They win 25% of what they bid, but only 6% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

8tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
24 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.4 L
of ₹1.1 Cr bid — 5.6% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count8 bids
25.0%
12.5%
62.5%
Awarded225.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected112.5%
Lost562.5%
By value₹1.1 Cr
37.3%
57.1%
Awarded₹6.4 L5.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹42.8 L37.3%
Lost₹65.4 L57.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹6.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Sinoj M George0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MUKESH VARKEY0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MUHAMMED UNAISE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
G S RAJEEV0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Benny Jose2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹15.5 L
won head-to-head
06
MUHAMMED SABIR GH1 win · 1 shared tender
₹7.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMOHAMMED ANEES awardedOthers

About MOHAMMED ANEES P M

MOHAMMED ANEES P M appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹6.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Local Self Government Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Sinoj M George, MUKESH VARKEY and MUHAMMED UNAISE. Sinoj M George bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MOHAMMED ANEES P M won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.