Competitor profile

MOHAMMAD IFTAKHAR ALAM

They win 13% of what they bid, and 7% of the value they chase.

32tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
15 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
32
32 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
17 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹52.0 L
of ₹7.3 Cr bid — 7.1% conversion
Win rate
12.5%
of 32 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count32 bids
12.5%
34.4%
53.1%
Awarded412.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1134.4%
Lost1753.1%
By value₹7.3 Cr
41.3%
51.6%
Awarded₹52.0 L7.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.0 Cr41.3%
Lost₹3.8 Cr51.6%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

NREP Sahibganj₹52.0 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹52.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
PRAVEEN KUMAR SAH2 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹51
won head-to-head
02
TASLIMA CONSTRUCTION3 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹50.6 L
won head-to-head
03
TARUN KUMAR MANDAL0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
AMITA BHAGAT1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹22
won head-to-head
05
MD ALI ANSARI1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹27.1 L
won head-to-head
06
Manoj Kumar0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMOHAMMAD IFTAKHAR awardedOthers

About MOHAMMAD IFTAKHAR ALAM

MOHAMMAD IFTAKHAR ALAM appears as a bidder on 32 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 32 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 12.5% win rate — worth ₹52.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is NREP Sahibganj, at 100.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against PRAVEEN KUMAR SAH, TASLIMA CONSTRUCTION and TARUN KUMAR MANDAL. PRAVEEN KUMAR SAH bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; MOHAMMAD IFTAKHAR ALAM won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.