Competitor profile

Mohammad Haseem

They win 60% of what they bid — and 76% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

5tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
30 Sept 2019last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.0 Cr
of ₹3.9 Cr bid — 75.8% conversion
Win rate
60.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count5 bids
60.0%
40.0%
Awarded360.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected240.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹3.9 Cr
75.8%
24.2%
Awarded₹3.0 Cr75.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹95.1 L24.2%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Mahipal Singh Sajwan0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Rajendra Bhatt0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Vinod Kumar Chauhan0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Ms Yamuna Nirman0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Ms Jai Gopal Associates0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/s Lakshika Construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMohammad Haseem awardedOthers

About Mohammad Haseem

Mohammad Haseem appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 60.0% win rate — worth ₹3.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2019.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chief Coordinator, PMGSY, Uttarkhand, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Mahipal Singh Sajwan, Rajendra Bhatt and Vinod Kumar Chauhan. Mahipal Singh Sajwan bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Mohammad Haseem won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.