Competitor profile

M/S MOHAMMAD HANEEF

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 20% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

9tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
1 Feb 2025last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹78.8 L
of ₹4.0 Cr bid — 19.8% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count9 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded333.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost666.7%
By value₹4.0 Cr
19.8%
80.2%
Awarded₹78.8 L19.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹3.2 Cr80.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹78.8 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RAIS AHAMAD2 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹64.2 L
won head-to-head
02
Sushil Chand Sharma1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹35.0 L
won head-to-head
03
SHAMIM AHMAD SIDDIQUI1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹46.8 L
won head-to-head
04
RAJ CONSTRUCTION1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
05
MUBEEN ALAM0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/s RAEES AHAMAD THEKEDAR1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹36.5 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMOHAMMAD HANEEF awardedOthers

About M/S MOHAMMAD HANEEF

M/S MOHAMMAD HANEEF appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹78.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Feb 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Executive Officer Nagar Palika Parishad Jaspur (U.S. Nagar), at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RAIS AHAMAD, Sushil Chand Sharma and SHAMIM AHMAD SIDDIQUI. RAIS AHAMAD bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/S MOHAMMAD HANEEF won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.