Competitor profile

MOHAMMAD HAIDAR ALI

They win 25% of what they bid, and 23% of the value they chase.

17tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
12 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
16
17 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
12 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹90.4 L
of ₹3.9 Cr bid — 22.9% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 16 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count16 bids
25.0%
75.0%
Awarded425.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1275.0%
By value₹3.9 Cr
23.0%
77.0%
Awarded₹90.4 L23.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹3.0 Cr77.0%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zila Parishad Latehar₹29.3 L32.4%
N.R.E.P LATEHAR.₹16.1 L17.9%
UDD Secretary₹2.4 L2.7%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹90.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
AJAY KUMAR GUPTA1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹30.8 L
won head-to-head
02
ARVIND YADAV0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
VISHAL KUMAR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SUBHAM KUMAR1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹43.6 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S M K ENTERPRISES1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹18.9 L
won head-to-head
06
S.B.M. Construction1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹20.7 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMOHAMMAD HAIDAR awardedOthers

About MOHAMMAD HAIDAR ALI

MOHAMMAD HAIDAR ALI appears as a bidder on 17 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 16 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹90.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 12 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is WRD EinC Major-Med n Minor, at 47.1% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 9.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against AJAY KUMAR GUPTA, ARVIND YADAV and VISHAL KUMAR. AJAY KUMAR GUPTA bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; MOHAMMAD HAIDAR ALI won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.