Competitor profile

MOHAMMAD AFZAL NAJAR

They win 17% of what they bid — and 29% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

7tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
31 Oct 2024last award
Total bids
6
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹41.1 L
of ₹1.4 Cr bid — 29.5% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
83.3%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost583.3%
By value₹1.4 Cr
29.5%
70.5%
Awarded₹41.1 L29.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹98.3 L70.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ASHIQ HUSSAIN BHAT0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S PYRAMID INFRATECH0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
opinder pal singh0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S MIR AND SONS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
FAVOURITE ELECTRICALS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
MK ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMOHAMMAD AFZAL awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MOHAMMAD AFZAL

About MOHAMMAD AFZAL NAJAR

MOHAMMAD AFZAL NAJAR appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹41.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 31 Oct 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Srinagar Smart City Limited SPV, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ASHIQ HUSSAIN BHAT, M/S PYRAMID INFRATECH and opinder pal singh. ASHIQ HUSSAIN BHAT bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MOHAMMAD AFZAL NAJAR won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.