Competitor profile

MN PATIL PVT.LTD

They win 20% of what they bid, but only 1% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

5tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
20 Aug 2025last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.8 L
of ₹6.7 Cr bid — 0.6% conversion
Win rate
20.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count5 bids
20.0%
40.0%
40.0%
Awarded120.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected240.0%
Lost240.0%
By value₹6.7 Cr
76.0%
23.4%
Awarded₹3.8 L0.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.1 Cr76.0%
Lost₹1.6 Cr23.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
JUSTIN GLOBAL SERVICES1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹15.1 L
won head-to-head
02
SWARAJYA ENTERPRISES2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹75.2 L
won head-to-head
03
Logisto Technologies Pvt. Ltd0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MAESTROBL INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹70.8 L
won head-to-head
05
Rohit Telecommunication1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹7.6 L
won head-to-head
06
TEJAS INFRACON0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMN PATIL PVT.LTD awardedOthers

About MN PATIL PVT.LTD

MN PATIL PVT.LTD appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 20.0% win rate — worth ₹3.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 Aug 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Maharashtra Natural Gas Ltd., at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 10.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against JUSTIN GLOBAL SERVICES, SWARAJYA ENTERPRISES and Logisto Technologies Pvt. Ltd. JUSTIN GLOBAL SERVICES bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; MN PATIL PVT.LTD won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.