Competitor profile

MISHRA ELECTRICAL SERVICE

They win 38% of what they bid — and 51% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

24tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
27 Jan 2024last award
Total bids
24
24 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
13 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.4 Cr
of ₹12.5 Cr bid — 50.7% conversion
Win rate
37.5%
of 24 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count24 bids
37.5%
54.2%
Awarded937.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected28.3%
Lost1354.2%
By value₹12.5 Cr
50.7%
11.6%
37.7%
Awarded₹6.4 Cr50.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.5 Cr11.6%
Lost₹4.7 Cr37.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

9 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
S K ENGINEERING WORKS0 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SUSHANTA ENGINEERS2 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹97.8 L
won head-to-head
03
RRR PERESTROIKA0 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/s RAJKISHORE MISHRA1 win · 16 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
05
CHINTAMANI ENTERPRISES1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹4.6 L
won head-to-head
06
M/s Maa tarini Engineers3 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹76.7 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMISHRA ELECTRICAL awardedOthers

About MISHRA ELECTRICAL SERVICE

MISHRA ELECTRICAL SERVICE appears as a bidder on 24 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 24 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 37.5% win rate — worth ₹6.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 27 Jan 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is National Aluminium Company Limited,NALCO, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against S K ENGINEERING WORKS, SUSHANTA ENGINEERS and RRR PERESTROIKA. S K ENGINEERING WORKS bid on 19 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MISHRA ELECTRICAL SERVICE won 9.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.