Competitor profile

M/s MIR MATTOO CONSTRUCTION

They win 33% of what they bid, and 31% of the value they chase.

9tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
21 Dec 2021last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹62.9 L
of ₹2.1 Cr bid — 30.6% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count9 bids
33.3%
11.1%
55.6%
Awarded333.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected111.1%
Lost555.6%
By value₹2.1 Cr
30.6%
15.1%
54.3%
Awarded₹62.9 L30.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹31.1 L15.1%
Lost₹1.1 Cr54.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

HAUDD₹62.9 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S MOHAMMAD YOUSF KAND1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹6.8 L
won head-to-head
02
MOHAMMAD ASHRAF FASHOO0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SHABIR HUSSAIN LATOO3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹60.8 L
won head-to-head
04
MOHAMMAD HANEEF NAGO0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S ZAHOOR AHMAD MANDOO0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S MEHBOOB-UL -ALAM CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMIR MATTOO awardedOthers

About M/s MIR MATTOO CONSTRUCTION

M/s MIR MATTOO CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹62.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Dec 2021.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is HAUDD, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S MOHAMMAD YOUSF KAND, MOHAMMAD ASHRAF FASHOO and SHABIR HUSSAIN LATOO. M/S MOHAMMAD YOUSF KAND bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/s MIR MATTOO CONSTRUCTION won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.