Competitor profile

MICROMATIC TECHNOLOGIES

They win 60% of what they bid, and 70% of the value they chase.

5tenders on record
5buyer authorities
0states
19 Sept 2025last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹12.1 L
of ₹17.4 L bid — 69.8% conversion
Win rate
60.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count5 bids
60.0%
40.0%
Awarded360.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected240.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹17.4 L
69.8%
30.2%
Awarded₹12.1 L69.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.2 L30.2%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

3 authorities · 0 states

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Conation Technologies1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹3.0 L
won head-to-head
02
CENSICO INTERNATIONAL0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Vacuum and Lab Technologies0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/s. SPOORTHI ENGINEERING EQUIPEMTNS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Chennai Metco Private Limited1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.2 L
won head-to-head
06
SPHOORTHI INDUSTRIES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMICROMATIC awardedOthers

About MICROMATIC TECHNOLOGIES

MICROMATIC TECHNOLOGIES appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 60.0% win rate — worth ₹12.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Sept 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Indian Institute of Technology Patna, at 51.6% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Conation Technologies, CENSICO INTERNATIONAL and Vacuum and Lab Technologies. Conation Technologies bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; MICROMATIC TECHNOLOGIES won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.