Competitor profile

MGA & Associates

They win 67% of what they bid, but only 20% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
10 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹25,000
of ₹1.3 L bid — 20.0% conversion
Win rate
66.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count6 bids
66.7%
33.3%
Awarded466.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected233.3%
Lost00.0%
By value₹1.3 L
20.0%
80.0%
Awarded₹25,00020.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.0 L80.0%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Department of Revenue₹25,000100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
J N GUPTA AND CO5 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹1.3 L
won head-to-head
02
Jain Jagawat Kamdar & Co3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹1.0 L
won head-to-head
03
Nimit Kalsi and Company3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
UCC and Associates LLP5 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹1.0 L
won head-to-head
05
Jain Chowdhary and Company4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹25,000
won head-to-head
06
SPARK and Associates3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹1.3 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMGA & Associates awardedOthers

About MGA & Associates

MGA & Associates appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 66.7% win rate — worth ₹25,000 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Revenue, at 100.0% of what it has won.

It most often bids against J N GUPTA AND CO, Jain Jagawat Kamdar & Co and Nimit Kalsi and Company. J N GUPTA AND CO bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; MGA & Associates won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.