Competitor profile

Mehta Stationers

They win 40% of what they bid, but only 17% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
23 Mar 2017last award
Total bids
5
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.6 L
of ₹39.8 L bid — 16.5% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count5 bids
40.0%
60.0%
Awarded240.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected360.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹39.8 L
16.5%
83.5%
Awarded₹6.6 L16.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹33.2 L83.5%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

ICDS - Director₹6.6 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹6.6 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S S. N. TRADERS1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹1,234
won head-to-head
02
SUKUMAL TRADERS0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
GOKUL TRADING COMPANY0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
AMARCHAND PANKAJKUMAR1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹954
won head-to-head
05
Kodia and Sons0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ASHIRWAD SUPPLIERS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹16.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMehta Stationers awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Mehta Stationers

About Mehta Stationers

Mehta Stationers appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹6.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Mar 2017.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is ICDS - Director, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S S. N. TRADERS, SUKUMAL TRADERS and GOKUL TRADING COMPANY. M/S S. N. TRADERS bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Mehta Stationers won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.