Competitor profile

MEHMOOD ZEENAT-MAHMOOD ASSOCIATES PVT LTD

They win 33% of what they bid, and 26% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
16 Mar 2014last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.7 Cr
of ₹25.6 Cr bid — 26.1% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded233.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost466.7%
By value₹25.6 Cr
26.1%
73.9%
Awarded₹6.7 Cr26.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹18.9 Cr73.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

WBSRDA₹6.7 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Amit Gupta-Gupta Construction4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹18.9 Cr
won head-to-head
03
SUBHAM GUPTA-SUBHAM ENTERPRISE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
PROSENJIT GHOSH-GHOSH ENTERPRISE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SUKLA SARKAR-M/S. R. K. SARKAR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMEHMOOD ZEENAT-MAHMOOD awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MEHMOOD ZEENAT-MAHMOOD

About MEHMOOD ZEENAT-MAHMOOD ASSOCIATES PVT LTD

MEHMOOD ZEENAT-MAHMOOD ASSOCIATES PVT LTD appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹6.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Mar 2014.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is WBSRDA, at 100.0% of what it has won.

It most often bids against KALYAN BANERJEE-M/S K BANERJEE AND BROTHERS, Amit Gupta-Gupta Construction and SUBHAM GUPTA-SUBHAM ENTERPRISE. KALYAN BANERJEE-M/S K BANERJEE AND BROTHERS bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MEHMOOD ZEENAT-MAHMOOD ASSOCIATES PVT LTD won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.