Competitor profile

MD ABU JAFAR

They win 36% of what they bid, and 30% of the value they chase.

66tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
17 Apr 2025last award
Total bids
66
66 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
24
22 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.7 Cr
of ₹15.8 Cr bid — 30.0% conversion
Win rate
36.4%
of 66 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count66 bids
36.4%
30.3%
33.3%
Awarded2436.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected2030.3%
Lost2233.3%
By value₹15.8 Cr
30.0%
29.6%
40.5%
Awarded₹4.7 Cr30.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.7 Cr29.6%
Lost₹6.4 Cr40.5%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Tripura₹4.7 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
HOMAYAN KABIR1 win · 15 shared tenders
₹21.8 L
won head-to-head
02
MD HANIF1 win · 11 shared tenders
₹21.5 L
won head-to-head
03
BISWAJIT MAJUMDER1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹16.4 L
won head-to-head
04
SABBIR AHAMMED BELALI2 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹28.1 L
won head-to-head
05
TARUN CHAKRABORTY2 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹39.2 L
won head-to-head
06
Biplab Debnath1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹33.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMD ABU JAFAR awardedOthers

About MD ABU JAFAR

MD ABU JAFAR appears as a bidder on 66 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 66 decided bids, it was awarded 24 — a 36.4% win rate — worth ₹4.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Apr 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chief Engineer, PWD (R and B), at 94.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Tripura. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against HOMAYAN KABIR, MD HANIF and BISWAJIT MAJUMDER. HOMAYAN KABIR bid on 15 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; MD ABU JAFAR won 9.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.