Competitor profile

MAZHAR IQBAL

They win 37% of what they bid, and 37% of the value they chase.

40tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
22 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
38
40 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
14
17 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.5 Cr
of ₹6.7 Cr bid — 36.8% conversion
Win rate
36.8%
of 38 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count38 bids
36.8%
18.4%
44.7%
Awarded1436.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected718.4%
Lost1744.7%
By value₹6.7 Cr
36.8%
23.5%
39.7%
Awarded₹2.5 Cr36.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.6 Cr23.5%
Lost₹2.7 Cr39.7%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

NREP LOHARDAGA.₹1.2 Cr48.8%
UDD Secretary₹30.4 L12.4%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹2.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Asfar Imam2 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹15.3 L
won head-to-head
02
IMTIYAZ ANSARI1 win · 15 shared tenders
₹49.4 L
won head-to-head
03
RAVINDRA KUMAR SINGH1 win · 14 shared tenders
₹11.9 L
won head-to-head
04
KHALID ALAM ANSARI0 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
PARTH ENTERPRISES1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹34.4 L
won head-to-head
06
M S CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMAZHAR IQBAL awardedOthers

About MAZHAR IQBAL

MAZHAR IQBAL appears as a bidder on 40 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 38 decided bids, it was awarded 14 — a 36.8% win rate — worth ₹2.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is NREP LOHARDAGA., at 48.8% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Asfar Imam, IMTIYAZ ANSARI and RAVINDRA KUMAR SINGH. Asfar Imam bid on 16 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; MAZHAR IQBAL won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.