Competitor profile

MATS PRINT PACK

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 3% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
4buyer authorities
0states
17 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.4 L
of ₹55.2 L bid — 2.6% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
33.3%
33.3%
33.3%
Awarded233.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected233.3%
Lost233.3%
By value₹55.2 L
78.5%
18.9%
Awarded₹1.4 L2.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹43.3 L78.5%
Lost₹10.4 L18.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Semaphore Technologies Private Limited0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Classic India0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SAROJA PRESS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Ambigai Printers0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
kALA GRAPHICS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
S R Towers India Pvt Ltd.0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMATS PRINT awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MATS PRINT

About MATS PRINT PACK

MATS PRINT PACK appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹1.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Pondicherry University, at 61.7% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Semaphore Technologies Private Limited, Classic India and SAROJA PRESS. Semaphore Technologies Private Limited bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MATS PRINT PACK won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.