Competitor profile

Matrubhoomi Construction

They win 13% of what they bid, and 14% of the value they chase.

136tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
21 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
131
136 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
17
108 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.7 Cr
of ₹48.8 Cr bid — 13.8% conversion
Win rate
13.0%
of 131 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count131 bids
13.0%
82.4%
Awarded1713.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected64.6%
Lost10882.4%
By value₹48.8 Cr
13.8%
80.8%
Awarded₹6.7 Cr13.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.6 Cr5.4%
Lost₹39.4 Cr80.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

17 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Bhadoria Associates4 wins · 21 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/s Ramesh Chandra6 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
03
SIDDHI VINAYAK CONSTRUCTION3 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹82.8 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S KAUSHIK CONSTRUCTION4 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹50.6 L
won head-to-head
05
M/s Bipin Construction2 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹61.2 L
won head-to-head
06
M/s Sachkhand Traders2 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹66.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMatrubhoomi awardedOthers

About Matrubhoomi Construction

Matrubhoomi Construction appears as a bidder on 136 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 131 decided bids, it was awarded 17 — a 13.0% win rate — worth ₹6.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 16.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Bhadoria Associates, M/s Ramesh Chandra and SIDDHI VINAYAK CONSTRUCTION. M/s Bhadoria Associates bid on 21 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; Matrubhoomi Construction won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.