Competitor profile

Mathew M

They win 36% of what they bid — and 49% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

14tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
21 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
14
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹33.1 L
of ₹67.8 L bid — 48.8% conversion
Win rate
35.7%
of 14 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count14 bids
35.7%
50.0%
14.3%
Awarded535.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected750.0%
Lost214.3%
By value₹67.8 L
48.8%
19.0%
32.2%
Awarded₹33.1 L48.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹12.9 L19.0%
Lost₹21.8 L32.2%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹33.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
K AND J BUILDERS7 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹12.9 L
won head-to-head
02
SIVAN PILLAI0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Baby Thomaskutty2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹13.8 L
won head-to-head
04
Sharon Shaji0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Anish0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SHEJEEB TM0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMathew M awardedOthers

About Mathew M

Mathew M appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 14 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 35.7% win rate — worth ₹33.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Local Self Government Department, at 82.2% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against K AND J BUILDERS, SIVAN PILLAI and Baby Thomaskutty. K AND J BUILDERS bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 7 of them; Mathew M won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.