Competitor profile

M/S MASHOOD AHMED MATTOO CONTRACTOR

They win 14% of what they bid, and 6% of the value they chase.

7tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
7 Mar 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹22.9 L
of ₹3.8 Cr bid — 6.1% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
14.3%
28.6%
57.1%
Awarded114.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected228.6%
Lost457.1%
By value₹3.8 Cr
46.5%
47.4%
Awarded₹22.9 L6.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.7 Cr46.5%
Lost₹1.8 Cr47.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S GMT0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MUSHTAQ AHMED RATHER0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Javeed Iqbal Ahanger0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Rajinder Kumar Wazir0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S Sanjeev Kumar Parihar0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMASHOOD AHMED awardedOthers

About M/S MASHOOD AHMED MATTOO CONTRACTOR

M/S MASHOOD AHMED MATTOO CONTRACTOR appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹22.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Mar 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chenab Valley Power Projects (P) Ltd, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S GMT, MUSHTAQ AHMED RATHER and Javeed Iqbal Ahanger. M/S GMT bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S MASHOOD AHMED MATTOO CONTRACTOR won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.