Competitor profile

MAPLE SERVICES

They win 50% of what they bid, and 53% of the value they chase.

8tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
14 Sept 2023last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹9.8 L
of ₹18.5 L bid — 53.1% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count8 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded450.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost450.0%
By value₹18.5 L
53.1%
46.9%
Awarded₹9.8 L53.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹8.7 L46.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RAJ COMPUTERS2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹5.1 L
won head-to-head
02
WELL MARKETING1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹97,500
won head-to-head
03
ROY SALES SERVICES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
PRIDE TECH ENGINEERING WORKS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MICRO COMPUTER0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
CRAS and CO0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMAPLE SERVICES awardedOthers

About MAPLE SERVICES

MAPLE SERVICES appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹9.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 14 Sept 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate of Shipping Services, at 65.7% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Andaman And Nicobar. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RAJ COMPUTERS, WELL MARKETING and ROY SALES SERVICES. RAJ COMPUTERS bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; MAPLE SERVICES won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.