Competitor profile

MANTU LAL SAHA

They win 30% of what they bid, and 28% of the value they chase.

60tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
29 Jan 2026last award
Total bids
60
60 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
18
31 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.6 Cr
of ₹13.0 Cr bid — 27.8% conversion
Win rate
30.0%
of 60 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count60 bids
30.0%
18.3%
51.7%
Awarded1830.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1118.3%
Lost3151.7%
By value₹13.0 Cr
27.8%
22.8%
49.3%
Awarded₹3.6 Cr27.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.0 Cr22.8%
Lost₹6.4 Cr49.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Tripura₹3.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ABU TAHER MIA6 wins · 30 shared tenders
₹85.0 L
won head-to-head
02
MANOJ KUMAR MAJUMDER3 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹83.2 L
won head-to-head
03
ANUP BARUA1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹18.2 L
won head-to-head
04
SAMAR PAUL1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹19.9 L
won head-to-head
05
Pradip Pal3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹19.2 L
won head-to-head
06
AKASH KAR3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹18.3 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMANTU LAL SAHA awardedOthers

About MANTU LAL SAHA

MANTU LAL SAHA appears as a bidder on 60 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 60 decided bids, it was awarded 18 — a 30.0% win rate — worth ₹3.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Jan 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chief Engineer, PWD (DWS), at 98.3% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Tripura. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ABU TAHER MIA, MANOJ KUMAR MAJUMDER and ANUP BARUA. ABU TAHER MIA bid on 30 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; MANTU LAL SAHA won 9.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.