Competitor profile

M/s Manorma Construction

They win 43% of what they bid, and 33% of the value they chase.

7tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
19 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.5 Cr
of ₹4.6 Cr bid — 33.4% conversion
Win rate
42.9%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
42.9%
14.3%
42.9%
Awarded342.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected114.3%
Lost342.9%
By value₹4.6 Cr
33.4%
21.4%
45.2%
Awarded₹1.5 Cr33.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹99.0 L21.4%
Lost₹2.1 Cr45.2%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

BCD EinC₹1.4 Cr93.2%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹1.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S RAJ CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S RAJESH KUMAR NAYAK0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S FRIEND ENTERPRISES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹92.5 L
won head-to-head
04
M/s Subhendu Narayan Shekhar0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SS ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
AMIT KUMAR MISHRA1 win · 1 shared tender
₹70.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedManorma Construction awardedOthers

About M/s Manorma Construction

M/s Manorma Construction appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 42.9% win rate — worth ₹1.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is BCD EinC, at 93.2% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S RAJ CONSTRUCTION, M/S RAJESH KUMAR NAYAK and M/S FRIEND ENTERPRISES. M/S RAJ CONSTRUCTION bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/s Manorma Construction won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.