Competitor profile

MANOJ TRIPATHI CONSTRUCTION

They win 33% of what they bid, and 41% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
9 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹16.1 L
of ₹39.1 L bid — 41.3% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded233.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost466.7%
By value₹39.1 L
41.3%
58.7%
Awarded₹16.1 L41.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹23.0 L58.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
KESHAV PRATAP SINGH PARMAR CONTRACTOR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SITARAM TRADERS2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹3.7 L
won head-to-head
03
AMIT SHARMA CONTRACTOR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
K AND A CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLIER0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
PANNA JUGAL KISHOR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
RADHE CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLIERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMANOJ TRIPATHI awardedOthers

About MANOJ TRIPATHI CONSTRUCTION

MANOJ TRIPATHI CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹16.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 9 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against KESHAV PRATAP SINGH PARMAR CONTRACTOR, SITARAM TRADERS and AMIT SHARMA CONTRACTOR. KESHAV PRATAP SINGH PARMAR CONTRACTOR bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MANOJ TRIPATHI CONSTRUCTION won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.