Competitor profile

MANOBENDRA SONOWAL

They win 17% of what they bid, and 15% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
16 Nov 2023last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.5 Cr
of ₹16.6 Cr bid — 15.1% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
83.3%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost583.3%
By value₹16.6 Cr
15.1%
84.9%
Awarded₹2.5 Cr15.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹14.1 Cr84.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

CE-ASM₹2.5 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ABUL FAZAL ABDULLAH0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
RAJ NAYAN BRAHMA0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
LAJIK BRAHMA1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹4.5 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Kamal Ch Goyary0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Rajen Boro1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.5 Cr
won head-to-head
06
Tirupati Construction Co0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMANOBENDRA awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MANOBENDRA

About MANOBENDRA SONOWAL

MANOBENDRA SONOWAL appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹2.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Nov 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE-ASM, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against ABUL FAZAL ABDULLAH, RAJ NAYAN BRAHMA and LAJIK BRAHMA. ABUL FAZAL ABDULLAH bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MANOBENDRA SONOWAL won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.