Competitor profile

Mano Kamal Sales Corporation

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 0.3% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

3tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4,500
of ₹15.1 L bid — 0.3% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹15.1 L
99.7%
Awarded₹4,5000.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹15.1 L99.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
JAMANA SALES CORPORATION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹11.2 L
won head-to-head
02
LAEEQUE AHAMED KHAN0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
S K TRADERS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹8.7 L
won head-to-head
04
subhash construction and suppiers1 win · 1 shared tender
₹12.4 L
won head-to-head
05
UNICARE MEDICAL SYSTEM1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.9 L
won head-to-head
06
BAISHNO TRADERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMano Kamal awardedOthers

About Mano Kamal Sales Corporation

Mano Kamal Sales Corporation appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹4,500 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate of Medical Education, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against JAMANA SALES CORPORATION, LAEEQUE AHAMED KHAN and S K TRADERS. JAMANA SALES CORPORATION bid on 1 of the same tender and won 1 of them; Mano Kamal Sales Corporation won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.