Competitor profile

mani kuruvilla

They win 21% of what they bid, and 13% of the value they chase.

14tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
10 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
14
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹8.4 L
of ₹63.5 L bid — 13.2% conversion
Win rate
21.4%
of 14 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count14 bids
21.4%
64.3%
14.3%
Awarded321.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected964.3%
Lost214.3%
By value₹63.5 L
13.2%
33.4%
53.4%
Awarded₹8.4 L13.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹21.2 L33.4%
Lost₹33.9 L53.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹8.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SUNIL K . M ,Kunnel Constructions1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹2.1 L
won head-to-head
02
NJ AGENCIES3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹9.1 L
won head-to-head
03
BINU PRINCE ABRAHAM0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Midhun Mathew2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹4.7 L
won head-to-head
05
SP CONSTRUCTIONS2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹3.0 L
won head-to-head
06
ALLEN GEORGE PHILIP0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedmani kuruvilla awardedOthers

About mani kuruvilla

mani kuruvilla appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 14 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 21.4% win rate — worth ₹8.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Local Self Government Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SUNIL K . M ,Kunnel Constructions, NJ AGENCIES and BINU PRINCE ABRAHAM. SUNIL K . M ,Kunnel Constructions bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; mani kuruvilla won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.