Competitor profile

MANGI LAL PATIDAR

They win 20% of what they bid, and 13% of the value they chase.

5tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
15 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹9.7 L
of ₹76.5 L bid — 12.7% conversion
Win rate
20.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count5 bids
20.0%
80.0%
Awarded120.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost480.0%
By value₹76.5 L
12.6%
87.4%
Awarded₹9.7 L12.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹66.8 L87.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
KESARINADAN CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MAHENDRA SINGH LOVEWANSHI2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹18.3 L
won head-to-head
03
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹39.4 L
won head-to-head
04
AVI ENTERPRISES AND CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
TECHNICAL FARMING AGRO SERVICES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
JAI THAKUR BABA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMANGI LAL PATIDAR awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MANGI LAL PATIDAR

About MANGI LAL PATIDAR

MANGI LAL PATIDAR appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 20.0% win rate — worth ₹9.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rural Engineering Service, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 12.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against KESARINADAN CONSTRUCTION, MAHENDRA SINGH LOVEWANSHI and INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER. KESARINADAN CONSTRUCTION bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MANGI LAL PATIDAR won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.