Competitor profile

MAMTAJ WELDING AND ENG. WORKS

They win 44% of what they bid, but only 33% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

9tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
7 May 2026last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹8.0 L
of ₹23.9 L bid — 33.5% conversion
Win rate
44.4%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count9 bids
44.4%
55.6%
Awarded444.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost555.6%
By value₹23.9 L
33.5%
66.5%
Awarded₹8.0 L33.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹15.9 L66.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NANTU KAZI1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹3.6 L
won head-to-head
02
KAZI ENGINEERING3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹10.7 L
won head-to-head
03
TAPAN KUMAR DUTTA0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
KARMAKAR ENGINEERING WORKS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹11.3 L
won head-to-head
05
MANISH GOSWAMI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
BAISHNAB DAS MISHRA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMAMTAJ WELDING awardedOthers

About MAMTAJ WELDING AND ENG. WORKS

MAMTAJ WELDING AND ENG. WORKS appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 44.4% win rate — worth ₹8.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Eastern Coalfields Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against NANTU KAZI, KAZI ENGINEERING and TAPAN KUMAR DUTTA. NANTU KAZI bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; MAMTAJ WELDING AND ENG. WORKS won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.