Competitor profile

MAMTA ENTERPRISES

They win 19% of what they bid, and 11% of the value they chase.

123tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
28 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
114
123 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
22
89 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹7.4 Cr
of ₹66.4 Cr bid — 11.1% conversion
Win rate
19.3%
of 114 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count114 bids
19.3%
78.1%
Awarded2219.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected32.6%
Lost8978.1%
By value₹66.4 Cr
11.1%
16.6%
72.3%
Awarded₹7.4 Cr11.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹11.0 Cr16.6%
Lost₹48.0 Cr72.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

22 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S KALSI ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS11 wins · 27 shared tenders
₹4.8 Cr
won head-to-head
02
ANIKET TRADERS4 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹78.1 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S JIWAN SINGH1 win · 18 shared tenders
₹10.9 L
won head-to-head
04
M/s Chopra Constructions1 win · 17 shared tenders
₹20.4 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S MOHAN LAL SHARMA2 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹80.8 L
won head-to-head
06
PROACH ASSOCIATES BUILDERS & ENGINEERS2 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMAMTA ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About MAMTA ENTERPRISES

MAMTA ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 123 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 114 decided bids, it was awarded 22 — a 19.3% win rate — worth ₹7.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 12.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S KALSI ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS, ANIKET TRADERS and M/S JIWAN SINGH. M/S KALSI ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS bid on 27 of the same tenders and won 11 of them; MAMTA ENTERPRISES won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.