Competitor profile

Mamta Enterprises

They win 17% of what they bid, but only 4% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
28 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.9 L
of ₹1.0 Cr bid — 3.8% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
16.7%
66.7%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected116.7%
Lost466.7%
By value₹1.0 Cr
96.2%
Awarded₹3.9 L3.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹740.0%
Lost₹98.7 L96.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
JAI RANJEET CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹39.9 L
won head-to-head
02
SHREE SIDDHI VINAYAK CONSTRUCTION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹28.8 L
won head-to-head
03
BANSAL DEVELOPER0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
YASH ENTERPRISES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹74
won head-to-head
05
Maheshwari Enterprises1 win · 1 shared tender
₹26.6 L
won head-to-head
06
SUNDARAM CONTRACTOR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMamta Enterprises awardedOthers

About Mamta Enterprises

Mamta Enterprises appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹3.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD- Roads and Bridges, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against JAI RANJEET CONSTRUCTION, SHREE SIDDHI VINAYAK CONSTRUCTION and BANSAL DEVELOPER. JAI RANJEET CONSTRUCTION bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; Mamta Enterprises won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.