Competitor profile

M/S MAMTA CONSTRUCTIONS

They win 29% of what they bid, and 22% of the value they chase.

114tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
25 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
101
114 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
29
69 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹13.4 Cr
of ₹62.3 Cr bid — 21.5% conversion
Win rate
28.7%
of 101 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count101 bids
28.7%
68.3%
Awarded2928.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected33.0%
Lost6968.3%
By value₹62.3 Cr
21.5%
21.1%
57.4%
Awarded₹13.4 Cr21.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹13.1 Cr21.1%
Lost₹35.8 Cr57.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

29 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Tulsi Enterprises4 wins · 41 shared tenders
₹57.1 L
won head-to-head
02
K P BUILDERS1 win · 37 shared tenders
₹22.5 L
won head-to-head
03
krishna Associate0 wins · 27 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
abhinav and company6 wins · 23 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/s Ranaji Construction Co2 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹65.2 L
won head-to-head
06
GANGA CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹55.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMAMTA CONSTRUCTIONS awardedOthers

About M/S MAMTA CONSTRUCTIONS

M/S MAMTA CONSTRUCTIONS appears as a bidder on 114 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 101 decided bids, it was awarded 29 — a 28.7% win rate — worth ₹13.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Tulsi Enterprises, K P BUILDERS and krishna Associate. Tulsi Enterprises bid on 41 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; M/S MAMTA CONSTRUCTIONS won 10.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.