Competitor profile

Mamta Construction Co

They win 41% of what they bid — and 69% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

34tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
20 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
34
34 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
14
14 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹65.2 Cr
of ₹94.8 Cr bid — 68.9% conversion
Win rate
41.2%
of 34 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count34 bids
41.2%
17.6%
41.2%
Awarded1441.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected617.6%
Lost1441.2%
By value₹94.8 Cr
68.9%
21.5%
Awarded₹65.2 Cr68.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹9.2 Cr9.7%
Lost₹20.4 Cr21.5%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

MD - UPCL₹19.3 Cr29.5%

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹65.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RP ELECTRICAL10 wins · 27 shared tenders
₹16.7 Cr
won head-to-head
02
RP INFRAPOWER PVT LTD3 wins · 21 shared tenders
₹3.9 Cr
won head-to-head
03
SHIV ELECTRICALS0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S GOVERDHAN TRADERS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1.7 Cr
won head-to-head
05
Raman electricals1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1.7 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M/S CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1.9 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMamta Construction awardedOthers

About Mamta Construction Co

Mamta Construction Co appears as a bidder on 34 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 34 decided bids, it was awarded 14 — a 41.2% win rate — worth ₹65.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD (Drinking Water) Peyjal Nigam GoUK, at 69.1% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against RP ELECTRICAL, RP INFRAPOWER PVT LTD and SHIV ELECTRICALS. RP ELECTRICAL bid on 27 of the same tenders and won 10 of them; Mamta Construction Co won 11.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.