Competitor profile

M/s MAMTA CONSTRUCTION

They win 14% of what they bid, and 6% of the value they chase.

7tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
27 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.9 L
of ₹97.1 L bid — 6.1% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
14.3%
14.3%
71.4%
Awarded114.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected114.3%
Lost571.4%
By value₹97.1 L
23.0%
70.9%
Awarded₹5.9 L6.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹22.4 L23.0%
Lost₹68.8 L70.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ANAND CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹12.1 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S B P ASSOCIATES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
ASSOCIATE ENGINEERING AND BUILDERS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹28.6 L
won head-to-head
04
Seema Enterprises1 win · 1 shared tender
₹34.1 L
won head-to-head
05
Ankit Chopra1 win · 1 shared tender
₹8.3 L
won head-to-head
06
SAT KABIR ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMAMTA CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MAMTA CONSTRUCTION

About M/s MAMTA CONSTRUCTION

M/s MAMTA CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹5.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 27 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 28.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ANAND CONSTRUCTION, M/S B P ASSOCIATES and ASSOCIATE ENGINEERING AND BUILDERS. ANAND CONSTRUCTION bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/s MAMTA CONSTRUCTION won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.