Competitor profile

MAMATA AMAT

They win 40% of what they bid — and 51% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

5tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
31 Mar 2025last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹21.2 L
of ₹41.9 L bid — 50.7% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count5 bids
40.0%
60.0%
Awarded240.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost360.0%
By value₹41.9 L
50.7%
49.3%
Awarded₹21.2 L50.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹20.7 L49.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Mahanadi Coalfields Limited₹21.2 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Sandeep Kumar Patel1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.3 L
won head-to-head
02
VIKASH KUMAR1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹7.4 L
won head-to-head
03
KSHETRAMANI MAHAKUL0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
L S CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Niraj Kumar Saw0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SRI SRI SHIV SHAKTI CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMAMATA AMAT awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MAMATA AMAT

About MAMATA AMAT

MAMATA AMAT appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹21.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 31 Mar 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Mahanadi Coalfields Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Sandeep Kumar Patel, VIKASH KUMAR and KSHETRAMANI MAHAKUL. Sandeep Kumar Patel bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; MAMATA AMAT won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.