Competitor profile

MAHIPAT LAL PATEL

They win 50% of what they bid, and 53% of the value they chase.

2tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
5 Dec 2017last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹30.3 Cr
of ₹56.6 Cr bid — 53.5% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹56.6 Cr
53.5%
46.5%
Awarded₹30.3 Cr53.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹26.3 Cr46.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

CE RW I₹30.3 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Sidhi Binayak Infrastructure0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S Maa Bhagwati Construction1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹24.4 Cr
won head-to-head
03
UPENDRA KUMAR PATRA0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SUNIL ENGICON PVT. LTD.0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMAHIPAT LAL awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MAHIPAT LAL

About MAHIPAT LAL PATEL

MAHIPAT LAL PATEL appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹30.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Dec 2017.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE RW I, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Sidhi Binayak Infrastructure, M/S Maa Bhagwati Construction and UPENDRA KUMAR PATRA. M/s Sidhi Binayak Infrastructure bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MAHIPAT LAL PATEL won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.