Competitor profile

MAHARAJ JI TRADERS

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 6% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

5tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
3 Feb 2025last award
Total bids
4
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.3 L
of ₹85.9 L bid — 6.1% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost250.0%
By value₹85.9 L
93.9%
Awarded₹5.3 L6.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹80.6 L93.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹5.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHIV ELECTRICALS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Olive Exports Private Limited0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
AMBA OXY ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
KRISHNA TRADING COMPANY1 win · 1 shared tender
₹3.3 L
won head-to-head
05
YKW UNIVERSAL SOLUTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
KHALSA CONTRACTORS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMAHARAJ JI awardedOthers

About MAHARAJ JI TRADERS

MAHARAJ JI TRADERS appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹5.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Feb 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Executive Director (Doiwala Sugar Company Ltd. Doiwala Dehradun), at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 17.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHIV ELECTRICALS, Olive Exports Private Limited and AMBA OXY ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED. SHIV ELECTRICALS bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; MAHARAJ JI TRADERS won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.