Competitor profile

MAGO CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.

They win 17% of what they bid, and 17% of the value they chase.

7tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
23 Aug 2025last award
Total bids
6
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹16.6 Cr
of ₹98.7 Cr bid — 16.8% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
83.3%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost583.3%
By value₹98.7 Cr
16.8%
83.2%
Awarded₹16.6 Cr16.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹82.1 Cr83.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NARSINGH DEVELOPERS LLP0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
₹0
won head-to-head
03
AMIT ASSOCIATES0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
RAMJI DAS DHAL CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
NITYA NAND AND SONS CONTRACTORS PVT LTD0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S RAJINDER SINGH0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMAGO CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MAGO CONSTRUCTION

About MAGO CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.

MAGO CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹16.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Aug 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 26.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against NARSINGH DEVELOPERS LLP, Pooja Singla Builders And Engineers Pvt Ltd and AMIT ASSOCIATES. NARSINGH DEVELOPERS LLP bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MAGO CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.