Competitor profile

MADHUR CONSTRUCTION

They win 43% of what they bid, and 45% of the value they chase.

7tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
22 May 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹44.9 L
of ₹99.4 L bid — 45.1% conversion
Win rate
42.9%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
42.9%
57.1%
Awarded342.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost457.1%
By value₹99.4 L
45.1%
54.9%
Awarded₹44.9 L45.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹54.5 L54.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
POOJA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
VAIDEHI ENTERPRISES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SIMRAT DEVELOPERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
DAKSHA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
PRABALDEVELOPERS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹11.0 L
won head-to-head
06
ANNU ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMADHUR CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About MADHUR CONSTRUCTION

MADHUR CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 42.9% win rate — worth ₹44.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against POOJA CONSTRUCTION, VAIDEHI ENTERPRISES and SIMRAT DEVELOPERS. POOJA CONSTRUCTION bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MADHUR CONSTRUCTION won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.