Competitor profile

MADHU. K.V

They win 27% of what they bid, but only 10% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

11tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
22 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
11
11 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹7.0 L
of ₹67.8 L bid — 10.3% conversion
Win rate
27.3%
of 11 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count11 bids
27.3%
63.6%
Awarded327.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected19.1%
Lost763.6%
By value₹67.8 L
10.3%
82.3%
Awarded₹7.0 L10.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.0 L7.4%
Lost₹55.8 L82.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Irrigation Department₹70,83210.1%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹7.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Krishnakumar Krishnan Nair2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹4.2 L
won head-to-head
02
KAMALASANAN.P.K3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹1.8 L
won head-to-head
03
NIMAL CONSTRUCTIONS2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹7.9 L
won head-to-head
04
PRABHA.M.V0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Stine P Wilson0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Abdul Ashik B.A1 win · 1 shared tender
₹44.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMADHU. K.V awardedOthers

About MADHU. K.V

MADHU. K.V appears as a bidder on 11 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 11 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 27.3% win rate — worth ₹7.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Local Self Government Department, at 89.9% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Krishnakumar Krishnan Nair, KAMALASANAN.P.K and NIMAL CONSTRUCTIONS. Krishnakumar Krishnan Nair bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; MADHU. K.V won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.