Competitor profile

MADAN LAL AND PARTNERS

They win 44% of what they bid, but only 27% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

9tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
21 Dec 2023last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹14.0 Cr
of ₹50.9 Cr bid — 27.4% conversion
Win rate
44.4%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count9 bids
44.4%
44.4%
11.1%
Awarded444.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected444.4%
Lost111.1%
By value₹50.9 Cr
27.4%
44.1%
28.5%
Awarded₹14.0 Cr27.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹22.5 Cr44.1%
Lost₹14.5 Cr28.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHRIRAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MORENA2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹5.6 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Giriraj Associates0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Ascon Infratech Pvt. Ltd.0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
ULTIMATE CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MAHESH KUMAR GURU CONTRACTOR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
BHUPENDRA SINGH0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMADAN LAL AND awardedOthers

About MADAN LAL AND PARTNERS

MADAN LAL AND PARTNERS appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 44.4% win rate — worth ₹14.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Dec 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SHRIRAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MORENA, Giriraj Associates and Ascon Infratech Pvt. Ltd.. SHRIRAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MORENA bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; MADAN LAL AND PARTNERS won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.