Competitor profile

M/S Maa Vindhyavasini Construction

They win 8% of what they bid, and 12% of the value they chase.

13tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
10 Mar 2025last award
Total bids
13
13 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
12 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹7.5 Cr
of ₹61.1 Cr bid — 12.3% conversion
Win rate
7.7%
of 13 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count13 bids
92.3%
Awarded17.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1292.3%
By value₹61.1 Cr
12.3%
87.7%
Awarded₹7.5 Cr12.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹53.6 Cr87.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

UPRRDA₹7.5 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
BALRAM SINGH YADAV4 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹14.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Ritesh Kumar Anand0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S ANMOL TRADERS0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Ms Dev Builders0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/s Shri Ganesh Enterprises1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹6.1 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M/s Ramsanehi and Sons0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMaa Vindhyavasini awardedOthers

About M/S Maa Vindhyavasini Construction

M/S Maa Vindhyavasini Construction appears as a bidder on 13 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 13 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 7.7% win rate — worth ₹7.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Mar 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is UPRRDA, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 10.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against BALRAM SINGH YADAV, Ritesh Kumar Anand and M/S ANMOL TRADERS. BALRAM SINGH YADAV bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; M/S Maa Vindhyavasini Construction won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.