Competitor profile

MAA SUJAAN CONSTRUCTION

They win 33% of what they bid — and 56% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

3tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
18 May 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.9 L
of ₹10.5 L bid — 56.4% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹10.5 L
56.4%
43.6%
Awarded₹5.9 L56.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹4.6 L43.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
S. Kumar and Company0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
ATUL LIKHI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
LAXMI ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MARUTI CONSTRUCTION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.6 L
won head-to-head
05
TOMAR CONSTRUCTION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.5 L
won head-to-head
06
SHRI DEVKRIPA BUILDERS AND SUPPLIERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMAA SUJAAN awardedOthers

About MAA SUJAAN CONSTRUCTION

MAA SUJAAN CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹5.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MP State Coperative Marketing Federation Ltd., at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 8.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against S. Kumar and Company, ATUL LIKHI and LAXMI ENTERPRISES. S. Kumar and Company bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; MAA SUJAAN CONSTRUCTION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.